Terada, T. (2012). 243 Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate is More Sensitive Than Acoustic Rhinometry or Rhinomanometry in Detecting Nasal Obstruction Using the Allergen Challenge Chamber. World Allergy Organization Journal.
Styl ChicagoTerada, Tetsuya. 243 Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate Is More Sensitive Than Acoustic Rhinometry or Rhinomanometry in Detecting Nasal Obstruction Using the Allergen Challenge Chamber. World Allergy Organization Journal, 2012.
Citace podle MLATerada, Tetsuya. 243 Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate Is More Sensitive Than Acoustic Rhinometry or Rhinomanometry in Detecting Nasal Obstruction Using the Allergen Challenge Chamber. World Allergy Organization Journal, 2012.
Upozornění: Tyto citace jsou generovány automaticky. Nemusí být zcela správně podle citačních pravidel..