MRI and ultrasound versus conventional measures of disease activity and structural damage in evaluating treatment efficacy in JIA. Do these imaging techniques have an additional value?

Benzer Materyaller

• MRI and ultrasound versus conventional measures of disease activity and structural damage in evaluating treatment efficacy in JIA. Do these imaging techniques have an additional value?
  Yazar:: Viola S, ve diğerleri
  Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2011-09-01)
• MRI and ultrasound versus conventional measures of disease activity and structural damage in evaluating treatment efficacy in JIA. Do these imaging techniques have an additional value?
  Yazar:: Malattia, C, ve diğerleri
  Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2011)
• PReS-FINAL-2010: Predictive value of whole-body MRI in juvenile dermatomyositis
  Yazar:: Malattia, C, ve diğerleri
  Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2013)
• 2.4 Magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography and conventional radiography in the assessment of bone erosions in juvenile idiopathic arthritis
  Yazar:: Malattia, C, ve diğerleri
  Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2008)
• Analysis of ceiling effect and score distribution of outcome measures in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)
  Yazar:: Lattanzi, B, ve diğerleri
  Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: (2008)